Last year, I noted that there was no power for 2 consecutive days during our first month of living on St. Kitts. The ostensible reason given was that the government-run electricity company was installing a new power generator to prevent load shedding (i.e. outages) in the future. Similar prolonged outages repeated a few times in subsequent months, but after that the situation stabilized. We have had fairly decent power supply over the course of 2008.
That was until October. On October 1st, we noticed one or more outages, which preceded a fire in the power plant on the morning of October 2nd. This fire brought 50% of the generating capacity offline, and we noticed this as frequent and repeated outages on October 2nd and 3rd. As of today, October 4th, electricity is being shut off at different parts of the island at largely unpredictable times and for largely unpredictable durations. Our area was without power for ten hours, from 08:30 to 18:30 today.
It all looks like this is going to continue at least until Monday. They're supposed to be putting online a smaller generator that was previously in maintenance, which will bring capacity up to 80% of peak demand. Further blackouts are certain for at least two weeks, as it takes time to repair at least the smaller one of the two generators that were damaged in the fire. With a power generating capacity of only 60% today, however, tomorrow we're most likely looking forward to another power-less Sunday.
This would have all been much easier to bear if the development we live in, St. Christopher Club, had a generator on backup, as many other businesses and institutions do, as well as most developments that cater to tourists. Unfortunately, the people who decide such things here, did purchase a generator, but are not keeping it online, as they consider the cost of maintenance too expensive. Apparently, the impact on the residents' quality of life (and in our case, loss off time that could be spent working) was not a factor in their equation.
I'm currently looking for a UPS solution, one that lasts longer than classic battery-based UPS, and can provide power to laptops and office equipment, as well as possibly a refrigerator, for at least 12 hours, although preferably up to 48. I'd like to avoid an oil-based generator, as they are loud and require frequent refueling, and thus onerous trips for gas. A nice solution would be a self-refueling UPS system based on water and fuel cells, which when powered would separate hydrogen and oxygen in water through electrolysis and store them in separate tanks, but when unpowered, would burn the hydrogen and oxygen back into water, producing electricity in the process. The best solution would be a closed system that doesn't burn oxygen from air, which would allow it to be stored inside without a risk of suffocation - if there is any such risk at all; it ought to be durable, not requiring new expensive batteries every 3 years; and it might be able to store sufficient capacity to last 12 hours, or even possibly days. Any tips?
Edited: Here's a fuel cell. Delivers up to 5 kW. Now all someone needs to do is bundle this into a system that will electrolyze water when there's power, and burn hydrogen when there is not.
It would sure beat 500 kg worth of batteries. That need replacing in 3-5 years.
Showing 10 out of 10 comments, oldest first:
Comment on Oct 5, 2008 at 12:52 by Anonymous
Comment on Oct 5, 2008 at 16:02 by denisbider
Regardless of the case, however: the local power company here could arrange for a robust power supply. If they knew what they were doing, they could prevent a fire; they could know that something was eventually going to go wrong, and they could structure the power supply so as to be resilient to localized failure.
The ability of a system to fail catastrophically like this is not because we poor people cannot predict the future. It is because someone failed to plan for an event like this. And failure to plan does not "just happen" because we're living in a "third world country" - for the most part, we are not. Failure to plan happens because people who should plan, don't plan.
As for my part, the fact that I write about conditions here, doesn't mean that I can't handle them. It doesn't mean they're swell and perfect, either.
Comment on Oct 5, 2008 at 16:21 by Anonymous
Comment on Oct 5, 2008 at 17:27 by denisbider
Now, the only issue is to get them here...
Comment on Nov 13, 2008 at 04:17 by verbatim
Is there maybe also an access to HD tv channels on this island? I saw that some Lesser Antilles are quite well developed in this field.
Comment on Nov 13, 2008 at 18:30 by denisbider
If you're okay with 2 MB/s download, you can get that much cheaper.
HDTV, nope. It's regular cable, lots of channels, but with poor fluctuating sound on many of them. St. Kitts is relatively far from the center of the area that North American TV satellites target, so lots of channels have poor reception during adverse weather.
We got a new cinema though! A multiplex worthy of a developed country. About half the size of Kolosej in Ljubljana, and apparently made to similar standards - like new-ish cinemas in developed countries elsewhere.
This is now becoming our preferred way to enjoy movies. :-)
Comment on Nov 13, 2008 at 20:38 by verbatim
Nice that you got cinema. I check their website and found out they also built some on other islands. I wonder if there will be enough people to visit them...
I found this picture on one blog from St. Kitts, dated September 2008. Are times changing in St. Kitts?
http://shrani.si/f/4/ug/zUijhK3/kitts.jpg
Comment on Nov 14, 2008 at 02:00 by denisbider
No, that picture is actually from the beach, it's expected to be like that. The Caribbean and all. The charm of half-made wooden shacks. You know.
Comment on Nov 14, 2008 at 15:46 by verbatim
Comment on Nov 14, 2008 at 21:52 by denisbider
We know for a fact that thongs are not allowed on the local Marriott beach, so... there's prudery, alright.