Robin Hanson quotes research which finds that blood donors aren't really put off by the prospect of being paid for their donation, they just don't want cash. Vouchers would work just fine, though.
Commenter Michael Keennan then comes up with this ingenious idea: instead of refusing to compensate organ donors at all due to ethical concerns, why not pay them back in kind? How about, for example, giving kidney donors free health insurance for the remainder of their lives? That would surely cause more people to consider donating their kidneys, which may save plenty lives; and I don't see how it raises any ethical dilemmas. Doesn't it seem fair and just for people who have donated an organ to receive free health care in return? Doesn't it seem more unjust if they do not?
Showing 6 out of 6 comments, oldest first:
Comment on Nov 8, 2009 at 02:34 by Anonymous
Should we make a difference, and if so what would it be ?
Comment on Nov 8, 2009 at 06:19 by denisbider
Comment on Nov 9, 2009 at 10:29 by Anonymous
Comment on Nov 9, 2009 at 20:59 by denisbider
We can't offer free health care to just anyone who checks a box though, because then everyone will check that box and no one will be paying in the first place.
Comment on Nov 17, 2009 at 01:53 by Anonymous
Comment on Nov 17, 2009 at 02:45 by denisbider
There is additionally the problem of what "taking care of your body" means as far as future organ donation is concerned. There's only so much you can do, or avoid doing. Whether, and which of, your organs are usable probably depends much more on how you died than how you lived.
There is furthermore the question of whether we're going to need organ donation in 40 years, anyway. We may be able to grow most replacement organs using the patient's own tissue at that time.
Taking all this into consideration, the discount you could offer to young people who sign up to donate whenever they end up dying, would be a very low discount, indeed.